{"id":43618,"date":"2019-07-28T22:27:41","date_gmt":"2019-07-28T20:27:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fjala.info\/?p=43618"},"modified":"2019-07-28T22:39:18","modified_gmt":"2019-07-28T20:39:18","slug":"barbarizem-juridik","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/","title":{"rendered":"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK!"},"content":{"rendered":"

AV. XHABIR ZEJNUNI<\/strong><\/p>\n

P\u00ebrmbajtja. Hyrje. 1. Vendimi Margjeka. 2. (\u00c7)Vendimi Reka. 3. Kronik\u00eb regjistrimi zgjedhor. 4. K\u00ebrkes\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00eb. 5. Probleme legjitimiteti. 6. Gj\u00ebja e gjykuar (res iudicata). 7. Shqyrtim i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit objekt nga e nj\u00ebjta shkall\u00eb gjykimi. 8. Legjitimitet k\u00ebrkimi. 9. Interes legjitim, apo e drejt\u00eb subjektive? 10. Titullaritet k\u00ebrkese. 11. Vet\u00ebm \u201cnoterizues\u201d?! 12. Gjykues dhe \u201cnoter\u201d! 13. P\u00ebrfundim.<\/p>\n

Hyrje<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Drejt\u00ebsia politike shqiptare, po pasurohet \u00e7do dit\u00eb (dhe nat\u00eb!) me terma t\u00eb reja, si\u00e7 jan\u00eb \u00e7dekretet dhe s\u00eb fundi \u00e7vendimet. Rasti m\u00eb i fundit, lidhet me \u00e7vendimin e dat\u00ebs 19 korrik t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 17 korrik t\u00eb s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs shkall\u00eb gjykimi t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Durr\u00ebsit n\u00eb lidhje me v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb kandidates socialiste Valbona Sako. Q\u00eb do thot\u00eb se vendimet e gjykatave n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e th\u00ebn\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb ankimohen n\u00eb shkall\u00ebt m\u00eb t\u00eb larta t\u00eb gjykimit si\u00e7 e parashikon Kushtetuta dhe ligjet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, por edhe brenda t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs shkall\u00eb gjykimi. Pra, tani mund t\u00eb kemi edhe \u201capel\u201d brenda t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs shkall\u00eb gjykimi!
\nKemi nj\u00eb vendim t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 17 korrik, i cili mban firm\u00ebn e gjykat\u00ebses Mimoza Margjeka.
\nKemi edhe \u00e7vendimin e dat\u00ebs 19 korrik, i cili mban firm\u00ebn e gjykuesit Shp\u00ebtim Reka.
\nDuhet th\u00ebn\u00eb se jehon\u00ebn e vendimit t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 17 korrik t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebses Mimoza Margjeka, e \u201ceklipsoi\u201d pas dy dit\u00ebsh kolegu i saj i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs \u201czyr\u00eb\u201d gjykuesi STAKANOVIST Shp\u00ebtim Reka.
\nKy \u00ebsht\u00eb skandali m\u00eb i madh juridik q\u00eb mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb njohur ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb jurisprudenca bot\u00ebrore.
\nN\u00eb 7 faqe \u00e7vendim, pjes\u00ebn m\u00eb t\u00eb madhe e z\u00ebn\u00eb normat ligjore, q\u00eb Reka i sjell (vet\u00ebm ato q\u00eb i interesojn\u00eb atij!) p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar \u00e7vendimin e tij dhe fakti (i p\u00ebrs\u00ebritur disa her\u00eb deri n\u00eb neveri!!!) q\u00eb \u201cLegjitimitetin p\u00ebr verifikim e ka jo vet\u00ebm kandidati fitues, por edhe partia apo koalicioni partiak q\u00eb e kan\u00eb propozuar at\u00eb\u201d. Nd\u00ebrsa arsyetimi profesional i gjykuesit Reka l\u00ebn shum\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebshiruar!<\/p>\n

1. Vendimi Margjeka<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Ja vlen q\u00eb t\u00eb analizohet shkurtimisht vendimi i gjykat\u00ebses Margjeka, p\u00ebr t\u2019i l\u00ebn\u00eb \u201cpjes\u00ebn e luanit\u201d pastaj kolegut t\u00eb saj Reka.
\nMargjeka thekson se \u201cPasi Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Durr\u00ebsit ju k\u00ebrkua nga kandidatja fituese Valbona Sako \u201cVERIFIKIMI i mandatit\u201d, Gjykata konstaton se, vendimi Nr. 230, dat\u00eb 27.04.2019 i KQZ-s\u00eb p\u00ebr regjistrimin si subjekt zgjedhor te Partis\u00eb \u201cBindja Demokratike\u201d, \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb hapur me nenin 64 t\u00eb Kodit Zgjedhor dhe nenin 9 t\u00eb Ligjit \u201cP\u00ebr Partit\u00eb Politike\u201d (ligji material), dhe p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, konstatohet nga gjykata si akt administrativ absolutisht i pavlefsh\u00ebm, sipas neneve 108 dhe 109 t\u00eb Kodit t\u00eb Procedurave Administrative\u201d.
\nM\u00eb tej, Margjeka sqaron se \u201cGjithashtu Partia \u201cBindja Demokratike\u201d, duke mos qen\u00eb e regjistruar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb, n\u00eb momentin e paraqitjes s\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u2019u regjistruar si subjekt zgjedhor n\u00eb KQZ, nuk kishte zot\u00ebsi juridike p\u00ebr t\u00eb fituar t\u00eb drejta dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb p\u00ebrsip\u00ebr detyrime, sikurse \u00ebsht\u00eb marrja pjes\u00eb n\u00eb zgjedhjet e Organeve t\u00eb Qeverisjes vendore t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 30.06.2019\u201d.
\nArsyetimi i gjykat\u00ebses Margjeka \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb i thjesht\u00eb dhe bind\u00ebs nga ana profesionale, pasi ajo konstatoi se pro\u00e7esi i votimit q\u00eb n\u00eb fillim ka qen\u00eb \u201cabsolutisht i pavlefsh\u00ebm\u201d, p\u00ebr arsyen se Komisioni Qendror i Zgjedhjeve ka p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb votime Partin\u00eb \u201cBindja Demokratike\u201d, e cila n\u00eb momentin e regjistrimit p\u00ebr n\u00eb pro\u00e7esin elektoral, nuk ekzistonte akoma juridikisht si parti politike. Si rrjedhoj\u00eb, Margjeka me t\u00eb drejt\u00eb nuk e njohu mandatin e Valbona Sakos p\u00ebr kryebashkiake.<\/p>\n

2. (\u00c7)Vendimi Reka<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Vendimi i Margjek\u00ebs, si\u00e7 pritej solli nj\u00eb reagim shum\u00eb t\u00eb ashp\u00ebr nga PS-ja, e cila mori p\u00ebrsip\u00ebr q\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb edhe nj\u00ebher\u00eb mandatin si \u201cV\u00cbRTETIM mandati\u201d n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb gjykimi. \u201cTruku\u201d i k\u00ebrkimit t\u00eb v\u00ebrtetimit dhe jo verifikimit t\u00eb mandatit, i sh\u00ebrbeu PS-s\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb evitonte ankimimin n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Apelit, si\u00e7 do duhej t\u00eb ishte ishte procedura normale. Por, edhe evitimin (ose frik\u00ebn!) e konfirmimit nga Apeli t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb Margjek\u00ebs.
\nPra, q\u00eb n\u00eb fillim jemi para nj\u00eb \u201crisie juridike\u201d Made in Albania! K\u00ebrkesa nga PS-ja, u b\u00eb me dat\u00ebn 18 korrik.
\nNd\u00ebrsa \u00e7vendimi me rezultat t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt (dhe t\u00eb pritsh\u00ebm!) u dha me dat\u00ebn 19 korrik nga Shp\u00ebtim Reka!
\nJa vlen q\u00eb t\u00eb analizohen fragmentet m\u00eb \u201cpikante\u201d t\u00eb k\u00ebtij \u00e7vendimi, duke qen\u00eb se aty shtrohen shum\u00eb probleme, t\u00eb cilat Reka i \u201czgjidhi\u201d brenda pak or\u00ebve!<\/p>\n

3. Kronik\u00eb regjistrimi zgjedhor<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Reka na informon se:
\na. \u201cKQZ-ja me vendimin Nr.148, dat\u00eb 11.04.2019 t\u00eb KQZ ka regjistruar PS-n\u00eb si subjekt zgjedhor p\u00ebr zgjedhjet p\u00ebr organet e qeverisjes vendore t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 30.06.2019\u201d;
\nb. \u201cKQZ-ja me vendimin Nr. 251, dat\u00eb 07.05.2019 ka regjistruar \u201cAleanc\u00ebn p\u00ebr Shqip\u00ebrin\u00eb Europiane\u201d (ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb edhe PS-ja bashk\u00eb me 23 parti politike t\u00eb tjera) si subjekt zgjedhor p\u00ebr zgjedhjet p\u00ebr organet e qeverisjes vendore t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 30.06.2019, duke regjistruar si kandidate t\u00eb tij p\u00ebr Kryetare t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Durr\u00ebs Valbona Sako\u201d;
\nc. \u201cKQZ-ja me vendimin Nr. 398, dat\u00eb 15.05.2019 ka regjistruar Valbona Sakon si kandidate p\u00ebr Kryetare t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Durr\u00ebs p\u00ebr zgjedhjet p\u00ebr organet e qeverisjes vendore t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 30 Qershor 2019\u201d;
\nd. \u201cKQZ-ja me me vendimin Nr. 944, dat\u00eb 05.07.2019 ka miratuar Tabel\u00ebn P\u00ebrmbledh\u00ebse t\u00eb Rezultatit p\u00ebr Zgjedhjet p\u00ebr Kryetar Bashkie Durr\u00ebs, duke shpallur fituese Valbona Sakon si kandidate t\u00eb propozuar nga Partia Socialiste e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d.
\nP\u00ebr sakt\u00ebsi, duhet th\u00ebn\u00eb se Valbona Sako \u00ebsht\u00eb kandidate e koalicionit ASHE dhe jo e PS-s\u00eb. Nga v\u00ebrtetimi l\u00ebshuar nga KQZ-ja, provohet se ndaj k\u00ebtij vendimi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ushtruar ankimim brenda afatit ligjor t\u00eb parashikuar nga Kodi Zgjedhor, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb q\u00eb ky vendim t\u00eb jet\u00eb i form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb.<\/p>\n

4. K\u00ebrkes\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00eb<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Reka shkruan se \u201cNga v\u00ebrtetimi l\u00ebshuar nga KQZ provohet se ndaj k\u00ebtij vendimi (t\u00eb shpalljes s\u00eb kandidatit fitues, XH.Z.) nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ushtruar ankim brenda afatit ligjor t\u00eb parashikuar nga Kodi Zgjedhor, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb q\u00eb Vendimi Nr. 944, dat\u00eb 05.07.2019 i KQZ t\u00eb jet\u00eb i form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrfundimtar\u201d.
\nK\u00ebtu, arsyetimi i Rek\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb i sakt\u00eb, pasi nj\u00eb vendim merr form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb vet\u00ebm at\u00ebher\u00eb kur ndaj tij nuk ushtrohet ankimim brenda afateve ligjore. N\u00eb rastin n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, ankimimi mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhej vet\u00ebm pran\u00eb Kolegjit Zgjedhor, i cili thot\u00eb fjal\u00ebn e fundit dhe ndaj t\u00eb cilit nuk mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhet ankimim tjet\u00ebr m\u00eb lart.
\nPS-ja, b\u00ebri nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb paralele dhe me objekt t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb kandidat t\u00eb propozuar nga ASHE. Nga ky fakt, rrjedh se legjitimitetin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs e kishte ASHE dhe jo PS-ja
\nReka shkruan se \u201cSipas V\u00ebrtetimit Nr. 196 P.B., dat\u00eb 19.07.2019 t\u00eb Kryesekretaris\u00eb s\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs rezulton se ky vendim (i gjykat\u00ebses Margjeka, XH.Z.) nuk ka marr\u00eb ende form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb mos p\u00ebrfundimit ende t\u00eb afatit t\u00eb ankimit dhe se deri n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb dat\u00eb ndaj tij nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ushtruar ankim\u201d.
\nSakt\u00eb. Si rrjedhoj\u00eb, duhej pritur afati 15 ditor i ankimimit n\u00eb Apel. Dhe pas k\u00ebtij afati, vendimi i m\u00ebsip\u00ebrm do merrte form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb. Por, n\u00ebse do merrte form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb vendimi, do sillte q\u00eb Valbona Sako t\u00eb mos mandatohej si kryebashkiake. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, u dha me ngut dy dit\u00eb m\u00eb pas nj\u00eb \u00e7vendim duke hedhur posht\u00eb vendimin e dy dit\u00ebve m\u00eb par\u00eb.<\/p>\n

5. Probleme legjitimiteti<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Reka n\u00eb \u00e7vendimin e tij shtron disa probleme:
\na. \u201cPengesa procedurale formale p\u00ebr gjykat\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb rishqyrtuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e paraqitur\u201d.
\nNuk jan\u00eb n\u00eb shqyrtim n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb dy gjykime t\u00eb nj\u00ebjta, pasi u dha m\u00eb par\u00eb vendimi i Margjek\u00ebs me dat\u00ebn 17 korrik, i cili u pasua me dat\u00ebn 19 korrik nga \u00e7vendimi i Rek\u00ebs. Objekti i gjykimit \u00ebsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb, duke sjell\u00eb q\u00eb edhe k\u00ebrkuesit t\u00eb jen\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00eb substancialisht, pavar\u00ebsisht se nga ana formale jan\u00eb t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm, pasi q\u00ebllimi final i PS-s\u00eb dhe i kandidat\u00ebs s\u00eb saj, \u00ebsht\u00eb mandati i kryebashkiakes. Edhe shkaku ligjor (causa petendi) \u00ebsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb ushtrimi legjitim i nj\u00eb funksioni publik t\u00eb fituar me an\u00eb t\u00eb vot\u00ebs s\u00eb lir\u00eb.
\nb. \u201cLegjitimiteti i k\u00ebrkuesit, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb Partia Socialiste n\u00eb paraqitjen e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb fitues n\u00eb zgjedhjet vendore\u201d.
\nK\u00ebrkesa e PS-s\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb legjitime p\u00ebr dy arsye.
\n– Zgjedhjet p\u00ebr bashkit\u00eb b\u00ebhen me sistemin mazhoritar dhe si rrjedhoj\u00eb mund t\u00eb ankimoj\u00eb vet\u00ebm kandidati direkt i interesuar dhe jo Partia q\u00eb e ka kandiduar at\u00eb. Nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb sistemin proporcional t\u00eb zgjedhjeve politike, i interesuar direkt \u00ebsht\u00eb subjekti politik q\u00eb ka paraqitur list\u00ebn e kandidat\u00ebve dhe jo kandidati.
\n– Kandidatja \u00ebsht\u00eb propozuar nga koalicioni ASHE, nd\u00ebrsa k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e ka b\u00ebr\u00eb PS-ja. Por, n\u00ebse pretendohet se k\u00ebrkuesja PS \u00ebsht\u00eb e nj\u00ebjt\u00eb me k\u00ebrkuesen (eventuale!) ASHE, at\u00ebher\u00eb rrjedh se PS-ja \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebrkuese e nj\u00ebjt\u00eb edhe me kandidaten e saj Valbona Sako.
\nc. \u201cKompetenca l\u00ebndore dhe materiale e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Durr\u00ebs\u201d.
\nKompetenc\u00ebn e vet l\u00ebndore dhe materiale, Gjykata e Durr\u00ebsit e ushtroi me vendimin e saj t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 17 korrik.
\nd. \u201cRoli dhe funksioni i Gjykat\u00ebs n\u00eb shqyrtimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb\u201d.
\nRoli i Gjykat\u00ebs, \u00ebsht\u00eb ai i verifikuesit t\u00eb vlefshm\u00ebris\u00eb ose jo t\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb fituar n\u00eb zgjedhjet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, si\u00e7 e parashikon edhe neni 60, par. 1 i Ligjit Nr. 139, dat\u00eb 17.12.2015 \u201cP\u00ebr vet\u00ebqeverisjen vendore\u201d, i cili parashikon se \u201cMandati i kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb v\u00ebrtetohet nga gjykata e rrethit gjyq\u00ebsor, (dhoma civile) n\u00eb juridiksionin e s\u00eb cil\u00ebs p\u00ebrfshihet bashkia p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, brenda 20 dit\u00ebve nga data e shpalljes s\u00eb rezultatit t\u00eb zgjedhjes s\u00eb tij\u201d.
\nPo ashtu, Reka shkruan se \u201cDuke qen\u00eb se nga Gjykata e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Durr\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim mbi k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Znj. Valbona Sako p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandati t\u00eb saj si Kryetare e Bashkis\u00eb Durr\u00ebs, fillimisht gjykata vler\u00ebson t\u00eb analizoj\u00eb n\u00ebse ekziston ndonj\u00eb penges\u00eb ligjore p\u00ebr shqyrtimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb paraqitur nga Partia Socialiste e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb Znj. Valbona Sako si Kryetare e Bashkis\u00eb Durr\u00ebs\u201d.
\nB\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr vendimin KUND\u00cbR Valbona Sakos, t\u00eb cilin Reka nuk e kualifikon si t\u00eb till\u00eb! Pasi n\u00ebse vendimi i par\u00eb do kishte qen\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb Sakos, nuk do kishte qen\u00eb nevoja q\u00eb t\u00eb mblidhej nj\u00eb trup tjet\u00ebr gjykues i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs shkall\u00eb gjykimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin objekt shqyrtimi.<\/p>\n

6. Gj\u00ebja e gjykuar (res iudicata)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Reka duke ju referuar nenit 451\/a t\u00eb K.Pr.C., shtron problemin se a kemi gj\u00ebn\u00eb e gjykuar dhe n\u00ebse jo, mund\u00ebsin\u00eb eventuale t\u00eb rigjykimit t\u00eb saj.
\nSipas Rek\u00ebs, \u201cGj\u00ebja e gjykuar nuk mund t\u00eb gjykohet s\u00ebrish n\u00ebse plot\u00ebsohen nj\u00ebherazi kat\u00ebr kushte:
\n– \u00e7\u00ebshtja i referohet t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtave pal\u00eb;
\n– \u00e7\u00ebshtja ka t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin objekt k\u00ebrkimi;
\n– \u00e7\u00ebshtja ka t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin shkak ligjor;
\n– vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs mbi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen \u00ebsht\u00eb i form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb\u201d.
\n\u201cN\u00ebse k\u00ebto kushte plot\u00ebsohen nj\u00ebherazi gjykata duhet t\u00eb vendos\u00eb rr\u00ebzimin e padis\u00eb. Mjafton t\u00eb mos plot\u00ebsohet nj\u00ebri nga k\u00ebta element\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb mos ndodhemi p\u00ebrpara \u201cgj\u00ebs\u00eb s\u00eb gjykuar\u201c.
\nN\u00eb fakt, b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr gjykimin n\u00eb shkall\u00ebt m\u00eb t\u00eb larta t\u00eb gjykimit dhe jo n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb gjykimi. Pasi neni 451\/a \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb Pjes\u00ebn e Tret\u00eb (\u201cAnkimet dhe m\u00ebnyra e gjykimit t\u00eb tyre\u201d), Titulli i Par\u00eb (\u201cAnkimet dhe paraqitja e tyre\u201d), Kreu i Par\u00eb (\u201cMjetet dhe afatet e ankimit\u201d). Nga leximi i normave para nenit 451\/a, evidencohet se ankimimi i nj\u00eb vendimi b\u00ebhet n\u00eb nj\u00eb shkall\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb gjykimi dhe jo brenda t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs shkall\u00eb gjykimi. Sidoqoft\u00eb, n\u00eb rastin n\u00eb shqyrtim, tre kushtet e para plot\u00ebsohen. Kushti i kat\u00ebrt, dihet se nuk plot\u00ebsohet, pasi duke qen\u00eb se nuk kan\u00eb kaluar 15 dit\u00ebt p\u00ebr t\u00eb apeluar vendimin e Margjek\u00ebs, rrjedh q\u00eb t\u00eb mos ndodhemi para gj\u00ebs\u00eb s\u00eb gjykuar. Nd\u00ebrsa sipas Rek\u00ebs, ekziston vet\u00ebm kushti 2.
\nSi mund t\u00eb kemi dy k\u00ebrkues t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, kur objekti i k\u00ebrkimit \u00ebsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb: mandati i kryebashkiakes? K\u00ebrkues t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm kemi vet\u00ebm n\u00eb rastin kur seicili prej tyre pretendon q\u00eb t\u00eb ket\u00eb di\u00e7ka n\u00eb favorin e tij, duke p\u00ebrjashtuar tjetrin n\u00eb g\u00ebzimin e tij. N\u00eb rastin n\u00eb shqyrtim, kemi k\u00ebrkues \u201cparalel\u00eb\u201d p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin objekt shqyrtimi. K\u00ebrkuese e ndryshme n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, do ishte vet\u00ebm kandidatja rivale: Valbona Sakollari. Sidoqoft\u00eb, duket veprim inteligjent fakti i shqyrtimit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes pa kaluar afati i ankimimit 15 ditor tek Gjykata e Apelit.
\nPo ashtu, si mund t\u00eb kemi shkaqe ligjore t\u00eb ndryshme (causa petendi) kur q\u00ebllimi i nj\u00eb subjekti politik n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet kandidatit t\u00eb propozuar prej tij, \u00ebsht\u00eb ushtrimi legjitim i nj\u00eb funksioni publik t\u00eb fituar me an\u00eb t\u00eb vot\u00ebs s\u00eb lir\u00eb? N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, fakti q\u00eb ankimimin e b\u00ebjn\u00eb dy subjekte t\u00eb ndryshme formalisht, por q\u00eb kan\u00eb q\u00ebllim t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00eb, b\u00ebn q\u00eb edhe shkaku ligjor t\u00eb jet\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb.
\nNga arsyetimet m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, Reka k\u00ebrkon t\u00eb bind\u00eb veten e tij, por jo t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt se \u201cGjykata arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se nuk ndodhemi n\u00eb kushtet e \u201cgj\u00ebs\u00eb s\u00eb gjykuar\u201c sipas nenit 451\/a t\u00eb K.Pr.C.\u201d.
\nN\u00eb rastin konkret, nuk mund t\u00eb jemi para gj\u00ebs\u00eb s\u00eb gjykuar n\u00ebse nuk ka kaluar afati 15 ditor i ankimimit pran\u00eb Apelit. Por, ky fakt nuk do thot\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebhet nj\u00eb pro\u00e7es paralel nga e nj\u00ebjta shkall\u00eb gjykimi.<\/p>\n

7. Shqyrtim i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit objekt nga e nj\u00ebjta shkall\u00eb gjykimi<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Reka, shqyrtimin e t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit rast prej tij, e justifikon me faktin se \u201cVendimi Nr.(11-201904127) 175, dat\u00eb 17.07.2019 i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Durr\u00ebs nuk ka marr\u00eb form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb, provuar nga V\u00ebrtetimi Nr.196, dt.19.07.2019 i Kryekretaris\u00eb s\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Durr\u00ebs\u201d.
\nN\u00eb fakt, v\u00ebrtetimi n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, provon vet\u00ebm dat\u00ebn e regjistrimit t\u00eb vendimit. Si do merrte pastaj form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb ky vendim pa kaluar afati 15 ditor p\u00ebr t\u2019u ankimuar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Apelit? Pas 15 dit\u00ebve do dal\u00eb nga Kryesekretaria a Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Durr\u00ebs v\u00ebrtetimi se vendimi Margjeka ka marr\u00eb form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb. Q\u00eb do thot\u00eb se pas dy dit\u00ebve t\u00eb tjera nuk duhet t\u00eb dal\u00eb nj\u00eb v\u00ebrtetim tjet\u00ebr nga Kryesekretaria a Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Durr\u00ebs se vendimi Reka ka marr\u00eb form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb. Ose do ndodh\u00eb m\u00eb e habitshmja q\u00eb t\u00eb dal\u00eb v\u00ebrtetimi vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr Rek\u00ebn dhe jo Margjek\u00ebn!
\nReka citon nenin 58 t\u00eb K.Pr.C., i cili parashikon se: \u201cKur n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn gjykat\u00eb ose gjykata t\u00eb ndryshme shqyrtohen n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb mosmarr\u00ebveshje midis t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtave pal\u00eb dhe kan\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin shkak e t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin objekt, vendoset pushimi i gjykimit t\u00eb mosmarr\u00ebveshjeve t\u00eb paraqitura pas asaj t\u00eb regjistruar m\u00eb par\u00eb\u201c.
\nN\u00eb rastin n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, nuk kemi gjykim n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit objekt gjykimi, por kemi gjykim t\u00eb nj\u00ebpasnj\u00ebsh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit objekt dhe n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb gjykimi. Por, edhe n\u00ebse do kishim dy gjykime t\u00eb nj\u00ebjta, nga t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat pal\u00eb, me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin objekt gjykimi dhe pran\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs gjykat\u00eb, si rregull do i takonte q\u00eb t\u00eb pushonte gjykimi i Rek\u00ebs i regjistruar pas gjykimit t\u00eb Margjek\u00ebs, ashtu si\u00e7 e parashikon K.Pr.C. tek neni 58.
\nPor, Reka ja lejon vetes s\u00eb tij t\u00eb shqyrtoj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e PS-s\u00eb, pasi sipas tij nuk ndodhemi para t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit shkak ligjor, edhe pse pal\u00ebt jan\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjta, kan\u00eb objekt t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00eb k\u00ebrkese dhe nuk ka kaluar afati i apelimit! Vet\u00ebm n\u00eb shkall\u00ebt m\u00eb t\u00eb larta t\u00eb gjykimit mund t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb q\u00eb shkaku ligjor t\u00eb mos jet\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00eb. Nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb shkall\u00ebn e par\u00eb t\u00eb gjykimit, ky problem nuk ekziston. Po ashtu, duhet shtuar nj\u00eb fakt shum\u00eb i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm. N\u00eb rastin n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, ndodhemi vet\u00ebm para nj\u00eb pale, duke qen\u00eb se kemi vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb subjekt k\u00ebrkues, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb Valbona Sako ose PS-ja, por jo edhe subjektin rival.<\/p>\n

8. Legjitimitet k\u00ebrkimi<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Reka sjell nenin 60 t\u00eb Ligjit Nr.139, dat\u00eb 17.12.2015 \u201cP\u00ebr vet\u00ebqeverisjen vendore\u201c (i ndryshuar) i cili parashikon se: \u201cMandati i kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb v\u00ebrtetohet nga gjykata e rrethit gjyq\u00ebsor, (dhoma civile) n\u00eb juridiksionin e s\u00eb cil\u00ebs p\u00ebrfshihet bashkia p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, brenda 20 dit\u00ebve nga data e shpalljes s\u00eb rezultatit t\u00eb zgjedhjes s\u00eb tij\u201d.
\nSipas Rek\u00ebs \u201cKjo dispozit\u00eb megjith\u00ebse p\u00ebrcakton n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar organin kompetent p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb dhe afatin brenda t\u00eb cilit kryhet ky v\u00ebrtetim, nuk tregon shprehimisht subjektin q\u00eb legjitimohet t\u00eb paraqes\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit\u201d.
\nSi \u201cnuk tregohet shprehimisht\u201d n\u00eb norm\u00ebn m\u00eb sip\u00ebr \u201csubjekti q\u00eb legjitimohet t\u00eb paraqes\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit\u201d, kur b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr \u201cmandatin e kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb\u201d dhe i interesuari direkt \u00ebsht\u00eb po vet\u00eb kandidatja q\u00eb ka fituar direkt mandatin ndaj kandidates tjet\u00ebr?! Po t\u00eb ecet me k\u00ebt\u00eb logjik\u00eb arsyetimi, at\u00ebher\u00eb i takon q\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit ta b\u00ebj\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pavarur (ose simultane!) kandidati fitues, subjekti politik q\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson ai, ose aleanca politike ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb partia politike q\u00eb e kandidon at\u00eb. Deri m\u00eb tani nuk ka ndodhur q\u00eb v\u00ebrtetimin ta k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb partit\u00eb politike apo aleancat politike. Por, e ka b\u00ebr\u00eb vet\u00ebm kandidati fitues.<\/p>\n

9. Interes legjitim, apo e drejt\u00eb subjektive?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Reka thot\u00eb se \u201cN\u00eb praktik\u00ebn e zakonshme t\u00eb zgjedhjeve t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb qeverisjes vendore, si k\u00ebrkues paraqitet kandidati fitues p\u00ebr kryetar bashkie, t\u00eb cilin gjykatat n\u00eb \u00e7do rast e kan\u00eb legjitimuar duke vler\u00ebsuar se ka nj\u00eb interes t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm n\u00eb paraqitjen e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs\u201d.
\nSakt\u00eb n\u00eb lidhje me legjitimitetin e k\u00ebrkuesit. Por, Reka nuk kuptohet se p\u00ebrse e kuailifikon k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e PS-s\u00eb si interes legjitim, kur n\u00eb fakt kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb vet\u00ebm me nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb subjektive. Pasi dallimi mes k\u00ebtyre dy parimeve juridike \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb i madh n\u00eb substanc\u00eb.
\nMe interes legjitim, kuptohet interesi i nj\u00eb subjekti q\u00eb organet e administrat\u00ebs publike t\u00eb ushtrojn\u00eb funksionin e tyre n\u00eb respektim t\u00eb normave ligjore p\u00ebr t\u00eb disiplinuar dhe rregulluar aktivitetin e tyre. M\u00eb sakt\u00eb, n\u00eb rastin konkret, interesi legjitim ishte q\u00eb zgjedhjet t\u00eb zhvilloheshin n\u00eb respektim t\u00eb ligjeve n\u00eb fuqi dhe jo fitimi i nj\u00eb mandati.
\nKurse e drejta subjektive pretendohet kur n\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn objektive (t\u00ebr\u00ebsia e normave ligjore t\u00eb nj\u00eb shteti p\u00ebr t\u00eb rregulluar jet\u00ebn sociale brenda kufijve t\u00eb tij) ekziston nj\u00eb norm\u00eb ligjore, e cila i lejon t\u00eb interesuarit q\u00eb t\u2019i drejtohet gjykat\u00ebsit p\u00ebr t\u00eb pasur nj\u00eb vendim n\u00eb favorin e tij. N\u00eb rastin konkret, kemi nenin 60 t\u00eb Ligjit Nr. 139 dat\u00eb 17.12.2015, i cili i jep t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn kandidates fituese p\u00ebr k\u00ebrkuar nga gjykata v\u00ebrtetimin, q\u00eb i lejon asaj ushtrimin e funksionit t\u00eb kryebashkiakes. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, PS-ja nuk ka pse t\u00eb pretendoj\u00eb nj\u00eb interes legjitim, por nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb subjektive q\u00eb n\u00eb rastin konkret p\u00ebrkon me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive t\u00eb kandidat\u00ebs s\u00eb saj fituese.
\nNga ky fakt, rrjedh se vendimi i Margjek\u00ebs vuri n\u00eb dukje nj\u00eb fakt shum\u00eb problematik, i cili ishte c\u00ebnimi i interesit legjitim si pasoj\u00eb e mos respektimit t\u00eb ligjit n\u00eb lidhje me regjistrimin e BD-s\u00eb jasht\u00eb afateve ligjore. Nga kjo shkelje, ligjore rrodhi q\u00eb t\u00eb mos p\u00ebrmbushej e drejta subjektive e kandidates socialiste.
\nPo ashtu, edhe Kushtetuta \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb e qart\u00eb kur parashikon n\u00eb nenin 42, par. 2 se \u201cKushdo, p\u00ebr mbrojtjen e t\u00eb drejtave, t\u00eb lirive dhe t\u00eb interesave t\u00eb tij kushtetues dhe ligjor\u00eb, ose n\u00eb rastin e akuzave t\u00eb ngritura kund\u00ebr tij, ka t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e nj\u00eb gjykimi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb dhe publik brenda nj\u00eb afati t\u00eb arsyesh\u00ebm nga nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb e pavarur dhe e paanshme e caktuar me ligj\u201d. Shihet shum\u00eb qart\u00eb edhe k\u00ebtu dallimi mes t\u00eb drejtave subjektive dhe interesave legjitime (ose ligjore).<\/p>\n

10. Titullaritet k\u00ebrkese<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Reka vazhdon \u201cP\u00ebrsa koh\u00eb dispozita nuk p\u00ebrcakton shprehimisht subjektin q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb paraqes\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit, gjykata i referohet rregullave t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuara n\u00eb nenin 32 t\u00eb K.Pr.C., i cili p\u00ebrcakton: \u201cPadia mund t\u00eb ngrihet: a) p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar rivendosjen e nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejte ose interesi t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb shkelur; b) p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e qenies ose mosqenies s\u00eb nj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje juridike ose nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejte; c) p\u00ebr njohjen e v\u00ebrtet\u00ebsis\u00eb ose pav\u00ebrtet\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb nj\u00eb dokumenti me pasoja juridike p\u00ebr padit\u00ebsin\u201d dhe parashikimeve t\u00eb Kodit Zgjedhor n\u00eb lidhje me legjitimin n\u00eb k\u00ebrkime t\u00eb kandidat\u00ebve, partive politike dhe koalicioneve zgjedhore\u201d.
\nN\u00eb rastin e pik\u00ebs b) t\u00eb nenit 32 t\u00eb K.Pr.C., duke qen\u00eb se m\u00eb par\u00eb b\u00ebri k\u00ebrkese kandidatja fituese dhe m\u00eb pas PS-ja, t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ajo e p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson, sjell si rrjedhoj\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb kemi mbivendosje k\u00ebrkuesish p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin objekt gjykimi dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00eb subjektive, n\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshme dhe jo nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht. N\u00eb rastin konkret, PS-ja ka paraqitur n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb rik\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebrtetuar mandatin e kryetares s\u00eb bashkis\u00eb t\u00eb kandidates fituese. PS-ja mbase mund t\u00eb legjitimohej n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e saj vet\u00ebm n\u00ebse kandidatja e saj fituese nuk do kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. Po ashtu, neni 32 i K.Pr.C. i referohet rasteve kur ngrihet nj\u00eb padi dhe jo faktit se kush legjitimohet q\u00eb t\u00eb kryeje padin\u00eb.
\nSipas Rek\u00ebs \u201cN\u00eb ato raste q\u00eb kandidati p\u00ebr kryetar bashkie regjistrohet n\u00eb KZQ si kandidat i nj\u00eb subjekti politik, legjitimimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit e ka si vet\u00eb kandidati, ashtu edhe nga partia, koalicioni apo partit\u00eb politike p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse\u201d.
\nN\u00eb fakt, par.1 i nenit 60, \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb i qart\u00eb, pasi legjitimon vet\u00ebm kandidatin fitues q\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb v\u00ebrtetimin. Dihet pastaj se kandidatin e propozon partia politike ku ai b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb apo koalicioni partiak. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pik\u00eb, legjislatori ka qen\u00eb shum\u00eb i qart\u00eb me normat ligjore p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. Por, ky fakt nuk mund t\u00eb \u00e7oj\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ai subjekt politik apo koalicion politik q\u00eb propozon kandidatin e tij, mund edhe t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit. Ky nen vlen edhe n\u00ebse do kishim nj\u00eb kandidat t\u00eb pavarur. Po ashtu, Rek\u00ebs i \u201crr\u00ebshqet\u201d nj\u00eb fakt pa u v\u00ebn\u00eb re: Valbona Sakon e ka propozuar si kandidate \u201cAleanca p\u00ebr Shqip\u00ebrin\u00eb Europiane\u201d, kurse k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb njohur mandatin e saj e ka b\u00ebr\u00eb PS-ja dhe jo ASHE-ja. Nga ky fakt, rrjedh se legjitimitetin p\u00ebr mandatin duhej ta kishte ASHE-ja dhe jo PS-ja.
\nReka vazhdon se \u201cNeni 145, par. 1 i Kodit Zgjedhor, parashikon se: \u201cSubjektet zgjedhore kan\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb ankim n\u00eb Kolegjin Zgjedhor t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit, Tiran\u00eb kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb KQZ-s\u00eb, kur ato c\u00ebnojn\u00eb interesat e tyre t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm brenda afatit t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb nenin 152 t\u00eb k\u00ebtij Kodi. T\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ankimit, sipas k\u00ebtij neni, e kan\u00eb edhe individ\u00ebt ose partit\u00eb politike, t\u00eb cil\u00ebve u \u00ebsht\u00eb refuzuar k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr regjistrim si subjekt zgjedhor\u201d, etj.\u201d
\nP\u00ebrs\u00ebri Reka ngat\u00ebrron t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive me interesin legjitim! Ose nuk e njeh aq mir\u00eb dallimin mes k\u00ebtyre dy parimeve! Rek\u00ebs nuk i bie n\u00eb sy di\u00e7ka, ose e harron me q\u00ebllim. Ndryshon rasti kur k\u00ebrkohet v\u00ebrtetimi i nj\u00eb mandati t\u00eb fituar n\u00eb zgjedhje nga e drejta e nj\u00eb ankimimi n\u00eb lidhje me c\u00ebnimin e nj\u00eb interesi legjitim. PS-ja nuk ka b\u00ebr\u00eb asnj\u00eb ankimim n\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb normave t\u00eb m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme, por ka b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb rik\u00ebrkes\u00eb p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb fituar nga kandidatja e saj.<\/p>\n

11. Vet\u00ebm \u201cnoterizues\u201d?!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sipas Rek\u00ebs \u201cReferuar k\u00ebtyre dispozitave (neni 60\/1 i Ligjit Nr. 139, dat\u00eb 17.12.2015, XH.Z) rezulton se roli i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb rrethit gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb verifikimi i plot\u00ebsimit t\u00eb kushteve formale t\u00eb aktit q\u00eb ka shpallur fitues kryetarin e bashkis\u00eb\u201d. M\u00eb tej, Reka shton se \u201cGjykata arrin n\u00eb konkluzionin se i vetmi element q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb analizohet prej saj n\u00eb shqyrtimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb ekzistenca e vendimit t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb KQZ p\u00ebr miratimin e Tabel\u00ebs P\u00ebrmbledh\u00ebse t\u00eb Rezultatit p\u00ebr Zgjedhjet p\u00ebr Kryetar Bashkie Durr\u00ebs\u201d.
\nPo t\u00eb ishte roli i gjykat\u00ebs vet\u00ebm ai i verifikimit formal t\u00eb vlefshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb mandatit, fare leht\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rol mund ta b\u00ebnte KQZ-ja n\u00eb momentin e shpalljes s\u00eb fituesit pa qen\u00eb nevoja e \u201cnd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebsimit\u201d t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs. Reka vihet n\u00eb rolin e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, duke i njohur (dhe imponuar!) gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb vetem rolin formal t\u00eb nj\u00eb n\u00ebpun\u00ebsi t\u00eb Gjendjes Civile, apo \u201cnoterizuesit\u201d t\u00eb nj\u00eb v\u00ebrtetimi. Por, ai harron (ose mbase edhe nuk e din) se nj\u00eb noter, i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb zyrtar publik, KURR\u00cb nuk mund (dhe nuk duhet) t\u00eb firmos\u00eb nj\u00eb AKT mes pal\u00ebve, n\u00ebse dokumentacioni n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb k\u00ebtij akti nuk respekton, ose m\u00eb sakt\u00eb shkel ligjet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. Noteri \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb funksionar publik jo vet\u00ebm formal, por m\u00eb e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishmja ai \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb funksionar publik substancial. Por, edhe n\u00ebse do merrej n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb varianti i Rek\u00ebs, i cili i cakton gjykat\u00ebsit vet\u00ebm rolin e \u201cnoterit\u201d formal, at\u00ebher\u00eb b\u00ebn \u00e7udi fakti se si Ligji Nr.139, dat\u00eb 17.12.2015 \u201cP\u00ebr vet\u00ebqeverisjen vendore\u201d, tek neni 60, par. 1, parashikon \u201cv\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb nga gjykata e rrethit gjyq\u00ebsor\u201d, nd\u00ebrsa tek par. 2 parashikon edhe \u201cdeklarimin e pavlefshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb\u201d. Nga ky fakt, rrjedh se \u201cnoteri\u201d e paska edhe tagrin e \u201cdeklarimit t\u00eb pavlefshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb\u201d p\u00ebr arsye t\u00eb parashikuara nga ligji! Reka mbase mund t\u00eb kishte t\u00eb drejt\u00eb vet\u00ebm n\u00ebse nuk do ishte par. 2(\u2026.)!
\nN\u00eb rastin konkret, roli i gjykat\u00ebsit \u00ebsht\u00eb ai i verifikuesit substancial jo vet\u00ebm t\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb fituesit, por edhe i procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb arritur deri tek fitimi i k\u00ebtij mandati. N\u00ebse n\u00eb rastin konkret askush nuk b\u00ebri nj\u00eb ankimim pran\u00eb KQZ-s\u00eb p\u00ebr procedur\u00ebn e ndjekur n\u00eb zgjedhjet lokale, kjo gj\u00eb nuk do thot\u00eb q\u00eb gjykat\u00ebsja s\u00eb cil\u00ebs ju k\u00ebrkua v\u00ebrtetimi i mandatit t\u00eb mos verifikonte q\u00eb n\u00eb fillim k\u00ebt\u00eb procedur\u00eb. Dhe jo vet\u00ebm t\u00eb mjaftohej me firmosjen e v\u00ebrtetimit t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar nga kandidatja fituese. Gjykat\u00ebsja Margjeka nuk kund\u00ebrshtoi n\u00eb vetvete nj\u00eb vendim t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb, por kund\u00ebrshtoi procedur\u00ebn antiligjore, q\u00eb u ndoq dhe nga e cila doli fituese kandidatja socialiste. \u00c7far\u00eb vlere do kishte at\u00ebher\u00eb vet\u00ebm \u00e7ertifikimi formal i nj\u00eb mandati t\u00eb fituar n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00eb vendimi t\u00eb KQZ-s\u00eb, kur procedura e fitimit t\u00eb k\u00ebtij mandati nuk mund t\u00eb shqyrtohej nga organi i cili ka tagrin p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb ligjit? N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, do mjaftonte vet\u00ebm fakti q\u00eb nj\u00eb mandat \u00ebsht\u00eb fituar, pa qen\u00eb nevoja e firmosjes s\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi nga nj\u00eb organ tjet\u00ebr. K\u00ebshtu do evitohej mbivendosja e organeve, duke mos ngarkuar k\u00ebshtu gjykat\u00ebn civile p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e mandatit t\u00eb fituar.<\/p>\n

12. Gjykues dhe \u201cnoter\u201d!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sidoqoft\u00eb, rolin e \u201cnoterit\u201d formal \u00e7ertifikues n\u00eb rastin konkret e mori gjykuesi Reka, duke vendosur:
\n1. \u201cT\u00eb pranoj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Partis\u00eb Socialiste e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb si pjes\u00eb e koalicionit zgjedhor Aleanca p\u00ebr Shqip\u00ebrin\u00eb Europiane\u201d;
\n2. \u201cT\u00eb v\u00ebrtetoj\u00eb mandatin si Kryetare e Bashkis\u00eb Durr\u00ebs t\u00eb Znj. Valbona Simo Sako n\u00eb zgjedhjet vendore t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 30 qershor 2019, sipas Vendimit Nr. 944, dat\u00eb 05.07.2019 t\u00eb KQZ\u201d.<\/p>\n

13. P\u00ebrfundim<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb \u00e7vendimin n\u00eb analiz\u00eb, gjykuesi Reka ka v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb plan t\u00eb par\u00eb arsyet dhe vler\u00ebsimet e tija personale (ose t\u00eb sugjeruara!) n\u00eb vend t\u00eb aplikimit t\u00eb ligjit, duke shkelur at\u00eb.
\nNdryshon rasti kur nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje gjykohet nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht nga trupa t\u00eb ndryshme gjykuese t\u00eb s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs shkall\u00eb gjykimi nga gjykimi i s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs \u00e7\u00ebshtje n\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshme nga trupa t\u00eb ndryshme gjykimi t\u00eb s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs shkall\u00eb gjykimi. Aq m\u00eb shum\u00eb kur \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb gjykimi i par\u00eb, i cili p\u00ebrmbyset nga gjykimi i dyt\u00eb.
\nGjykuesi Rama n\u00eb rastin konkret kur \u201cshorti\u201d (apo fati!) i caktoi atij gjykimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, duhej t\u2019i drejtohej Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese q\u00eb t\u00eb interpretonte kushtetutshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e faktit n\u00ebse nj\u00eb trup gjykues mundet (apo duhet) t\u00eb gjykoj\u00eb nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb gjykuar m\u00eb par\u00eb nga nga nj\u00eb trup tjet\u00ebr gjykues i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs shkall\u00eb gjykimi. E gjitha kjo n\u00eb respekt t\u00eb parimit NE BIS IN DEM (mos p\u00ebrs\u00ebritja e t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit gjykim m\u00eb shum\u00eb se nj\u00ebher\u00eb).
\nN\u00ebse gjykuesi Reka do i n\u00ebshtrohet ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb vettingut(!), ai jo vet\u00ebm nuk mund t\u00eb kthehet n\u00eb Shkoll\u00ebn e Magjistratur\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u2019u ritrajnuar si ndonj\u00eb koleg i tiji(!), por ka mund\u00ebsi q\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtohet p\u00ebrjet\u00eb nga funksioni i tij. Pasi \u00e7vendimi i tij, p\u00ebrb\u00ebn nj\u00eb precedent shum\u00eb t\u00eb rreziksh\u00ebm p\u00ebr m\u00eb von\u00eb, sepse mund t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb q\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen k\u00ebt\u00eb precendet ta p\u00ebrdor\u00eb ndonj\u00eb subjekt tjet\u00ebr politik (ose pse jo edhe i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb: PS-ja!). Aq m\u00eb shum\u00eb po t\u00eb marr\u00ebsh parasysh edhe faktin q\u00eb ky \u00e7vendim nuk u ankimua nga kandidatja rivale Valbona Sakollari! Ose t\u00eb ankimohej edhe nga Patozi n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e Kapos s\u00eb BD-s\u00eb, i cili ka deklaruar se \u201cDo shkoj\u00eb deri n\u00eb Hag\u00eb, duke qen\u00eb se zgjedhjet jan\u00eb vjedhur\u201d, por nga ana tjet\u00ebr ai nuk begenisi q\u00eb t\u00eb shkoj\u00eb deri n\u00eb Durr\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb ankimuar ket\u00eb \u00e7vendim skandaloz!
\nPor, problemi tjet\u00ebr m\u00eb i madh \u00ebsht\u00eb se Reka me \u00e7vendimin e tij nuk e pati tagrin q\u00eb t\u00eb shfuqizoj\u00eb vendimin e koleges s\u00eb tij Margjeka. K\u00ebshtuq\u00eb, ne ndodhemi p\u00ebrpara dy vendimeve me rezultate t\u00eb kund\u00ebrta (duke qen\u00eb se deri m\u00eb tani vendimi i par\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb hedhur posht\u00eb nga nj\u00eb shkall\u00eb m\u00eb e lart\u00eb gjykimi).
\nNuk duhet harruar edhe fakti tjet\u00ebr se vendimi i Margjek\u00ebs do marr\u00eb form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb dy dit\u00eb para \u00e7vendimit t\u00eb Rek\u00ebs, duke e b\u00ebr\u00eb k\u00ebshtu t\u00eb pavlefsh\u00ebm at\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, vendimi i par\u00eb duhet zbatuar. N\u00ebse PS-ja do pretendonte q\u00eb t\u00eb merrte zbatim \u00e7vendimi Reka, m\u00eb par\u00eb do duhej t\u00eb investonte Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjidhur ng\u00ebr\u00e7in e krijuar nga Reka (me \u201csugjerimin\u201d e PS-s\u00eb!). Por, Gjykata Kushtetuese p\u00ebr momentin nuk ekziston dhe nuk dihet se kur do ekzistoj\u00eb! Nuk duhet harruar se nj\u00eb vendim t\u00eb nj\u00eb shkalle m\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebt gjykimi, mund ta ndryshoj\u00eb apo ta hedh\u00eb posht\u00eb vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb shkall\u00eb m\u00eb e lart\u00eb gjykimi, por KURR\u00cb e nj\u00ebjta shkall\u00eb gjykimi.
\nDuke qen\u00eb se \u00e7udit\u00eb shqiptare nuk marrin fund, merret vesh se Valbona Sako ka deklaruar se \u201cT\u00eb h\u00ebn\u00ebn (29 korrik) do ta apeloj vendimin n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Apelit Durr\u00ebs, p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn time q\u00eb kam arritur me mund\u201d! Supozohet se Valbona Sako i referohet vendimit t\u00eb Margjek\u00ebs! Q\u00eb do thot\u00eb se as ajo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb akoma dakord me \u00e7vendimin Reka!<\/p>\n

Sidoqoft\u00eb, komplimenti stakanovistit Reka!<\/p>\n

28.07.2019<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

AV. XHABIR ZEJNUNI P\u00ebrmbajtja. Hyrje. 1. Vendimi Margjeka. 2. (\u00c7)Vendimi Reka. 3. Kronik\u00eb regjistrimi zgjedhor. 4. K\u00ebrkes\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00eb. 5. Probleme legjitimiteti. 6. Gj\u00ebja e gjykuar (res iudicata). 7. Shqyrtim i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit objekt nga e nj\u00ebjta shkall\u00eb gjykimi. 8. Legjitimitet k\u00ebrkimi. 9. Interes legjitim, apo e drejt\u00eb subjektive? 10. Titullaritet k\u00ebrkese. 11. Vet\u00ebm \u201cnoterizues\u201d?! […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":43619,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-artikuj"],"yoast_head":"\nBARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK! - FJALA e LIR\u00cb<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK! - FJALA e LIR\u00cb\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"AV. XHABIR ZEJNUNI P\u00ebrmbajtja. Hyrje. 1. Vendimi Margjeka. 2. (\u00c7)Vendimi Reka. 3. Kronik\u00eb regjistrimi zgjedhor. 4. K\u00ebrkes\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00eb. 5. Probleme legjitimiteti. 6. Gj\u00ebja e gjykuar (res iudicata). 7. Shqyrtim i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit objekt nga e nj\u00ebjta shkall\u00eb gjykimi. 8. Legjitimitet k\u00ebrkimi. 9. Interes legjitim, apo e drejt\u00eb subjektive? 10. Titullaritet k\u00ebrkese. 11. Vet\u00ebm \u201cnoterizues\u201d?! […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"FJALA e LIR\u00cb\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/facebook.com\/fjala.info\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/facebook.com\/shkoder.net\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-28T20:27:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-28T20:39:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"300\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"385\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/acokaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@acokaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"28 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9c9fccf4f6449d25e258607d9b4275cb\"},\"headline\":\"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK!\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-28T20:27:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-28T20:39:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":5520,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Artikuj\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/\",\"name\":\"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK! - FJALA e LIR\u00cb\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-28T20:27:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-28T20:39:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9c9fccf4f6449d25e258607d9b4275cb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg\",\"width\":300,\"height\":385,\"caption\":\"barbarizem juridik\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/barbarizem-juridik\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK!\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/\",\"name\":\"FJALA e LIR\u00cb\",\"description\":\""E para ishte fjala..." - n\u00eb Shkoder.net\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jehonashqiptare.al\\\/fjala\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9c9fccf4f6449d25e258607d9b4275cb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/be103c95acc3db7547b619bb966688693542eac057aaed7ec4502234d461b6e3?s=96&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/be103c95acc3db7547b619bb966688693542eac057aaed7ec4502234d461b6e3?s=96&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/be103c95acc3db7547b619bb966688693542eac057aaed7ec4502234d461b6e3?s=96&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"description\":\"Arben \u00c7okaj - M\u00ebsues Fizike & Informatike :: Gazetar & Analist i pavarur :: Autor librash :: Ueb- & Grafik dizajner\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/fjala.info\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/facebook.com\\\/shkoder.net\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/acokaj\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/https:\\\/\\\/twitter.com\\\/acokaj\",\"https:\\\/\\\/youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCWHTIr21i1vLKsLzVv1TM-w\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK! - FJALA e LIR\u00cb","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK! - FJALA e LIR\u00cb","og_description":"AV. XHABIR ZEJNUNI P\u00ebrmbajtja. Hyrje. 1. Vendimi Margjeka. 2. (\u00c7)Vendimi Reka. 3. Kronik\u00eb regjistrimi zgjedhor. 4. K\u00ebrkes\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00eb. 5. Probleme legjitimiteti. 6. Gj\u00ebja e gjykuar (res iudicata). 7. Shqyrtim i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit objekt nga e nj\u00ebjta shkall\u00eb gjykimi. 8. Legjitimitet k\u00ebrkimi. 9. Interes legjitim, apo e drejt\u00eb subjektive? 10. Titullaritet k\u00ebrkese. 11. Vet\u00ebm \u201cnoterizues\u201d?! […]","og_url":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/","og_site_name":"FJALA e LIR\u00cb","article_publisher":"https:\/\/facebook.com\/fjala.info\/","article_author":"https:\/\/facebook.com\/shkoder.net\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-28T20:27:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-28T20:39:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":300,"height":385,"url":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/acokaj","twitter_site":"@acokaj","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"28 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/#\/schema\/person\/9c9fccf4f6449d25e258607d9b4275cb"},"headline":"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK!","datePublished":"2019-07-28T20:27:41+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-28T20:39:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/"},"wordCount":5520,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg","articleSection":["Artikuj"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/","url":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/","name":"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK! - FJALA e LIR\u00cb","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg","datePublished":"2019-07-28T20:27:41+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-28T20:39:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/#\/schema\/person\/9c9fccf4f6449d25e258607d9b4275cb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/barbarizem_juridik.jpg","width":300,"height":385,"caption":"barbarizem juridik"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/barbarizem-juridik\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"BARBARIZ\u00cbM JURIDIK!"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/#website","url":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/","name":"FJALA e LIR\u00cb","description":""E para ishte fjala..." - n\u00eb Shkoder.net","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/#\/schema\/person\/9c9fccf4f6449d25e258607d9b4275cb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be103c95acc3db7547b619bb966688693542eac057aaed7ec4502234d461b6e3?s=96&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be103c95acc3db7547b619bb966688693542eac057aaed7ec4502234d461b6e3?s=96&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be103c95acc3db7547b619bb966688693542eac057aaed7ec4502234d461b6e3?s=96&r=g","caption":"admin"},"description":"Arben \u00c7okaj - M\u00ebsues Fizike & Informatike :: Gazetar & Analist i pavarur :: Autor librash :: Ueb- & Grafik dizajner","sameAs":["https:\/\/fjala.info\/","https:\/\/facebook.com\/shkoder.net\/","https:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/acokaj\/","https:\/\/x.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/acokaj","https:\/\/youtube.com\/channel\/UCWHTIr21i1vLKsLzVv1TM-w"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43618\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/43619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jehonashqiptare.al\/fjala\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}